INSR Publisher follows a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality, integrity, and originality of all submitted manuscripts. The key steps of the process are as follows:
Initial Manuscript Screening
All submissions are first reviewed by the editorial team for scope, formatting, and plagiarism.
Manuscripts that do not meet the journal’s basic standards are rejected at this stage.
Assignment to Reviewers
Manuscripts passing the initial screening are assigned to two or more independent experts in the relevant field.
Reviewers are selected based on their expertise, experience, and publication record.
Double-Blind Review
Both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review process to ensure impartiality.
Reviewers evaluate the manuscript on originality, methodology, significance, clarity, and ethical compliance.
Reviewer Feedback
Reviewers provide detailed comments and recommendations, which may include:
Acceptance
Minor revisions
Major revisions
Rejection
Editorial Decision
The editorial board reviews the reviewers’ feedback and makes the final decision on the manuscript.
Authors are informed of the decision along with constructive feedback for improvement.
Revision and Final Acceptance
If revisions are requested, authors must address reviewer comments and resubmit the manuscript.
The revised manuscript may undergo additional review before final acceptance.
Publication
Accepted manuscripts are processed for copyediting, typesetting, and online publication.
INSR Publisher ensures that all published articles meet high academic and ethical standards.
INSR Publisher is committed to transparency, quality, and academic integrity, providing authors with a fair and constructive review experience while ensuring readers access reliable and credible research.